<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Social Jobs on MYLES — Strategy &amp; Innovation Consulting</title><link>https://myles-innovation.com/tags/social-jobs/</link><description>Recent content in Social Jobs on MYLES — Strategy &amp; Innovation Consulting</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://myles-innovation.com/tags/social-jobs/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Functional, Emotional, and Social Jobs: Understanding the Full Picture</title><link>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/functional-emotional-social-jobs/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/functional-emotional-social-jobs/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-70-of-customer-needs-that-your-product-team-ignores"&gt;The 70% of Customer Needs That Your Product Team Ignores&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When I ask product teams in manufacturing and MedTech what their customers need, the answer invariably focuses on performance specifications. Faster cycle times. Higher precision. Better durability. Lower weight. More throughput.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These are functional needs — and they matter. But they are not the whole picture. Not even close.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In every JTBD/ODI study we have conducted — across loader cranes, surgical instruments, feeding systems, power management, agricultural equipment — emotional and social outcomes account for 30-40% of the total underserved need landscape. In some categories, they dominate it. A product team that captures only functional needs is making investment decisions based on 60-70% of the available information. They are leaving the rest to chance — and to competitors who pay attention.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>