<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Mechanical Engineering on MYLES — Strategy &amp; Innovation Consulting</title><link>https://myles-innovation.com/tags/mechanical-engineering/</link><description>Recent content in Mechanical Engineering on MYLES — Strategy &amp; Innovation Consulting</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://myles-innovation.com/tags/mechanical-engineering/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Outcome-Driven Innovation in the DACH Region</title><link>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/odi-dach-region/</link><pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/odi-dach-region/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="why-an-american-framework-fits-dach-engineering-culture-better-than-expected"&gt;Why an American Framework Fits DACH Engineering Culture Better Than Expected&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Outcome-Driven Innovation (ODI) was developed in the United States. Tony Ulwick refined the methodology over three decades and hundreds of projects with companies including Johnson &amp;amp; Johnson, Microsoft, and Bosch. The headline number: 86 percent of ODI-guided product launches succeed — five times the industry average.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Those figures are impressive. But for a German engineer, an Austrian product manager, or a Swiss managing director, an American success story is not enough. The real question is: &lt;strong&gt;does this work here? In our culture, with our customers, in our markets?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>