<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Innovation Metrics on MYLES — Strategy &amp; Innovation Consulting</title><link>https://myles-innovation.com/tags/innovation-metrics/</link><description>Recent content in Innovation Metrics on MYLES — Strategy &amp; Innovation Consulting</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://myles-innovation.com/tags/innovation-metrics/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Innovation Metrics: Measuring What Matters Beyond Patent Counts</title><link>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/innovation-metrics-measurement/</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/innovation-metrics-measurement/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-vanity-metric-trap"&gt;The Vanity Metric Trap&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How does your company measure innovation? If your answer includes patent counts, R&amp;amp;D spending as a percentage of revenue, number of ideas generated, or percentage of revenue from &amp;ldquo;new&amp;rdquo; products, you are measuring innovation theater — the appearance of innovation activity — rather than innovation effectiveness.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;These metrics are everywhere. Boards love them. Annual reports feature them. Innovation consultants benchmark against them. And they are, at best, weakly correlated with actual innovation outcomes.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Measuring Product Innovation: Metrics That Actually Matter</title><link>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/product-innovation-metrics/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/product-innovation-metrics/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-measurement-theater-problem"&gt;The Measurement Theater Problem&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Every VP of Product or Innovation I speak with can tell me how many new products they launched last year, how many patents their engineers filed, and what their R&amp;amp;D spending is as a percentage of revenue. Almost none of them can tell me whether those launches addressed the customer outcomes that were most underserved, what proportion of their R&amp;amp;D investment targeted genuinely unmet needs, or how the satisfaction of their customers&amp;rsquo; most important outcomes has changed over the past three years.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>