<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Chinese Competition on MYLES — Strategy &amp; Innovation Consulting</title><link>https://myles-innovation.com/tags/chinese-competition/</link><description>Recent content in Chinese Competition on MYLES — Strategy &amp; Innovation Consulting</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0100</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://myles-innovation.com/tags/chinese-competition/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Chinese Competition: Innovation as the Answer to Price Pressure</title><link>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/chinese-competition-innovation-response/</link><pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://myles-innovation.com/blog/chinese-competition-innovation-response/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-wrong-response-to-a-real-problem"&gt;The Wrong Response to a Real Problem&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In the last three years, I have sat in strategy sessions at half a dozen DACH industrial manufacturers where the agenda item was labeled something like &amp;ldquo;Chinese competition response strategy.&amp;rdquo; The conclusions reached in those meetings have been remarkably consistent, and remarkably misguided.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The typical response: cut costs, defend price, emphasize quality and reliability as differentiators, and hope that the regulatory environment in Europe will create enough friction to slow Chinese market penetration. Some companies add a slide about &amp;ldquo;innovation&amp;rdquo; to the deck — but when you look at what they mean by innovation, it is usually a feature roadmap that had already been planned before the competitive pressure appeared.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>